Current:Home > reviewsNew state program aims to put 500,000 acres of Montana prairie under conservation leases -ValueCore
New state program aims to put 500,000 acres of Montana prairie under conservation leases
View
Date:2025-04-19 19:38:35
Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks has received tentative approval to enroll 10 eastern Montana properties in a newly launched state program to conserve prairie habitat.
The Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission on Thursday voted unanimously to authorize the Prairie Habitat Conservation Lease Program’s first batch of agreements and signaled its support for the program’s larger objective of putting 500,000 acres of eastern Montana prairie into 40-year conservation lease agreements.
The program aims to protect the habitat for a variety of prairie species, ranging from mule deer and pronghorn to waterfowl, sage grouse and other grassland birds. The leases are also intended to support ongoing agricultural operations, public hunting and other forms of wildlife-related recreation. The program “may also help with avoiding potential federal listings of imperiled native species,” according to an FWP memo to commissioners.
The first round of leases encompasses more than 52,000 acres. The largest lease involves a $1.4 million payment for the landowner’s agreement to place an 11,600-acre property south of Malta under a 40-year conservation agreement. The Montana Land Board must sign off on that lease and seven of the others because the properties are over 500 acres or the lease agreement tops $1 million — criteria that trigger the Land Board’s approval per a law legislators passed in 2021.
All 10 properties will allow some degree of public hunting during commission-approved hunting seasons, generally September through December, according to Ken McDonald with FWP’s wildlife division. The leases will be funded by a variety of sources, including Habitat Montana, the Migratory Bird Wetland Program and the Pittman-Robertson fund, which funnels federal taxes on firearms, archery equipment and ammunition toward state-led wildlife restoration projects.
Three people spoke in favor of the program during the commission’s remote meeting on Thursday, although one commenter noted that he does have some reservations about the agency’s shift away from perpetual easements.
Montana Wildlife Federation Conservation Director Jeff Lukas said his organization originally opposed the transition to termed leases due to concern that adopting time-limited leases does not provide the “bang for the buck that permanent conservation leases do for a similar cost.”
However, Lukas continued, “Temporary leases are better than no leases at all, (and) we support using Habitat Montana funds for these leases when these funds would otherwise be unused.”
Ben Lamb with the Montana Conservation Society said he appreciated that the program would protect habitat, increase public access and help farmers and ranchers “make sure the home place is kept in the family.”
“That can really be a game changer for a lot of traditional families,” he said, adding that he appreciated that the program allows for faster approval and more certainty on its outcome than the permanent conservation easements that have been the norm in Montana.
“As someone who was really skeptical in the beginning and is now fully on board, I just want to say what a tremendous job the agency has done in something that looks like it could be a really good benefit to everybody — and hopefully lead to more conservation easements in the future,” Lamb said.
In a process similar to the one commissioners used Thursday, future lease agreements will go before the commission for approval.
___
This story was originally published by Montana Free Press and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
veryGood! (65)
Related
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- A former fundraiser for Rep. George Santos has been charged with wire fraud and identity theft
- Could HS football games in Florida be delayed or postponed due to heat? Answer is yes.
- Trump, co-defendants in Georgia election case expected to be booked in Fulton County jail, sheriff says
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Evacuations ordered as Northern California fire roars through forest near site of 2022 deadly blaze
- Blind Side family accuses Michael Oher of shakedown try
- House Oversight Committee member asks chairman to refer Snyder to the DOJ for investigation
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Body of strangled 11-year-old Texas girl found hidden under bed after sex assault, police say
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- A year in, landmark U.S. climate policy drives energy transition but hurdles remain
- Horoscopes Today, August 16, 2023
- Madonna announces new North American dates for her Celebration Tour
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Company asks judge to block Alabama medical marijuana licenses
- Why Backstreet Boys' AJ McLean Separates His Persona From His Real Self as Alex
- Maui's cultural landmarks burned, but all is not lost
Recommendation
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
Leonard Bernstein's Kids Defend Bradley Cooper Amid Criticism Over Prosthetic Nose in Maestro
Trouble in paradise? AP data analysis shows fires, other disasters are increasing in Hawaii
Bolt was missing on police helicopter that crashed in South Carolina, report says
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
House Oversight Committee member asks chairman to refer Snyder to the DOJ for investigation
Federal grants will replace tunnels beneath roads that let water pass but not fish
What happens when a narcissist becomes a parent? They force their kids into these roles.